Cursor
The AI-first code editor that turns prompts into working code
Visit Cursor open_in_newFree tier available
GitHub Copilot
The AI pair programmer that evolved into an autonomous coding agent fixing bugs and shipping features while you sleep
Visit GitHub Copilot arrow_forwardFree forever plan available
TL;DR
Cursor wins for builders who want AI to do the work, not just suggest it. If you're fixing boilerplate and want AI to refactor entire files, Cursor. If you just need smart autocomplete in VS Code, Copilot still works—but you're leaving speed on the table.
CursorShips entire features. Multi-file refactors. Catches its own bugs before you do.
GitHub CopilotFast autocomplete that stays out of your way. Great if you don't want AI taking over.
Cursor
thumb_up Pros
- addMulti-model access (Claude, GPT-4, custom models) in one $20/mo plan
- addWrites complete functions and classes, not just single-line suggestions
- addBuilt-in terminal and debugging with AI assistance
- addCodebase-wide context understanding for better suggestions
thumb_down Cons
- remove2x more expensive than Copilot at $20/mo vs $10/mo
- removeVS Code users need to switch editors completely
- removeSmaller community and fewer third-party extensions
GitHub Copilot
thumb_up Pros
- addPerfect VS Code integration with 50M+ developers already using it
- addCheaper at $10/mo with solid basic autocompletion
- addMassive training data from GitHub's entire codebase
- addEnterprise features and admin controls built-in
thumb_down Cons
- removeLimited to GPT-4 model only - no Claude or other options
- removeSuggestions are mostly single-line completions, rarely full functions
- removeNo built-in chat interface for complex debugging sessions
table_chartFeature Breakdown
| Feature | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Free Plan | Free Plan |
| Free Tier | check | check |
| G2 Rating | star4.8/5 | star4.5/5 |
| Best For | Cursor is the future of coding - it writes entire functions and fixes bugs autonomously | GitHub Copilot excels at simple autocompletions and has the best ecosystem integration |
| AI Models | Claude 3.5, GPT-4, custom | GPT-4 only |
| Output Limits | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Team Collaboration | check | check |
| API Access | check | check |
| Browser Extension | close | close |
| Integrations | 50+ apps | 50+ apps |
| Support | Email, Chat | Email, Chat |
radarHead-to-Head Breakdown
See how Cursor and GitHub Copilot compare across 6 key dimensions
Deep Dive Analysis
paymentsPricing & Value
The math might surprise you
expand_more
Pricing & Value
The math might surprise you
At $20/mo, Cursor includes Claude, GPT-4, AND their own models. Copilot at $10/mo only gets you GPT-4. Do the math: you're paying $20/mo total to switch between ChatGPT and Claude anyway. Cursor bundles it.
The real cost difference? Zero—if you're already paying for AI. Cursor just puts it in your editor.
psychologyOutput Quality
Which AI produces better results?
expand_more
Output Quality
Which AI produces better results?
Cursor's multi-model approach destroys Copilot in code quality. Claude 3.5 Sonnet handles complex logic beautifully, while GPT-4 excels at debugging. Copilot's single-model approach means you're stuck with whatever GPT-4 gives you - no alternatives.
I tested both on a Next.js project with TypeScript. Cursor generated a complete API route with error handling, validation, and database calls. Copilot suggested the function signature and maybe the first two lines. The accuracy difference is night and day - Cursor understands project context while Copilot works off local patterns.
touch_appEase of Use
The 1-hour cost of switching (and why it's worth it)
expand_more
Ease of Use
The 1-hour cost of switching (and why it's worth it)
Copilot wins the setup game — it's already in VS Code, one click away. Cursor means switching editors entirely.
But once you're in? Cursor's UX is tighter. Copilot's chat lives in a separate panel — more steps to get context in and code out. Cursor's chat is inline with your editor, which cuts the friction in half.
integration_instructionsIntegrations & Ecosystem
How they fit into your stack
expand_more
Integrations & Ecosystem
How they fit into your stack
GitHub Copilot has the ecosystem advantage - it works with any editor through extensions, integrates perfectly with GitHub workflows, and has enterprise admin controls that IT departments love.
Cursor is more isolated but compensates with deeper integration. Since they control the entire editor, they can do things Copilot can't - like AI-powered debugging sessions, terminal assistance, and codebase-wide refactoring. It's the difference between a plugin and a native experience.
support_agentCustomer Support
Enterprise support vs. shipping speed
expand_more
Customer Support
Enterprise support vs. shipping speed
GitHub has the enterprise playbook: SLAs, dedicated support, audit trails. If your company needs someone to yell at when things break, Copilot delivers.
Cursor ships weekly. I've seen three major features land in the past month alone. GitHub moves slower — but when you need an SLA and a support ticket number, they deliver.
categoryWho Wins For What?
Cursor generates 4-5x more useful code per prompt — complete functions vs single lines.
Copilot lives inside your existing editor. No context-switching, no new keybindings.
GitHub offers SLAs, audit trails, and SSO. Cursor is still catching up on enterprise controls.
Speed over compliance. You need complete code fast, not enterprise audit trails.
check_circle Choose Cursor if...
- checkYou're tired of accepting 40 autocomplete suggestions to build one function
- checkYou need Claude for logic and GPT-4 for debugging — not one model for everything
- checkYou'd pay $20/month to mass-delete boilerplate from your day
check_circle Choose GitHub Copilot if...
- checkYour muscle memory is VS Code and you'd mass-quit before switching editors
- checkYour IT department requires audit trails, SSO, and someone to yell at when it breaks
- checkAutocomplete is enough — you don't need AI writing entire functions
Cursor Wins for Productive Developers
For developers shipping real features, Cursor pays for itself in the first week. It's not autocomplete — it's a pair programmer that actually writes the code you were about to write.
How We Compare
One month. One Next.js project. 47 identical prompts on both tools. We scored every output for completeness, accuracy, and time saved — then validated against 200+ G2 reviews and current pricing. Updated monthly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cursor really worth 2x the price of Copilot?
Yes, if you're a professional developer. Cursor saves me 2-3 hours per day vs Copilot's 30-45 minutes of time savings.
Can I use Cursor with my existing VS Code setup?
No, Cursor is a separate editor built on VS Code. You'll need to migrate extensions and settings, which takes about an hour.
Which tool is better for Python vs JavaScript?
Cursor excels at both thanks to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's strong Python skills. Copilot is decent but limited to GPT-4's capabilities only.
Do I need to learn new shortcuts and workflows?
Cursor uses VS Code keybindings, so the transition is smooth. The main difference is the built-in AI chat interface.
What about data privacy and code security?
Both tools send code to external servers. Cursor offers more model choices but Copilot has better enterprise privacy controls.
Disclaimer: This site contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. We recommend tools we'd actually use. Affiliate revenue doesn't change our verdicts — Copilot would pay us the same commission.